I loved an article in the Globe's Ideas section today, as I frequently love articles in that section of the Globe. This one was about sidewalks - more like about a woman who is about sidewalks. Actually, it was about a woman who wrote a book about sidewalks, and I anticipate loving the book as I loved the article.
Sidewalks are the arteries and organs of urbanity and a thing much neglected in the public mind. Even our own fine walk-anywhere city finds its sidewalks squeezed and mutilated to accommodate vehicular traffic, presumably to support the irrational fantasy of parking in front of your destination. University of New Orleans' Renia Ehrenfeucht takes up their cause with UCLA's Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris in what promises to be a bright-eyed, broad-minded book, "Sidewalks: Conflict and Negotiation over Public Space", out in May.
Showing posts with label civil society. Show all posts
Showing posts with label civil society. Show all posts
Sunday, January 25, 2009
Tuesday, August 19, 2008
Shared Spaces: harnessing the civility of people
A recent article in the Boston Globe Magazine suggests "Boston drivers are bad, but Boston pedestrians might be worse", presumably because they break traffic rules. But what if the rules are the problem? Because of the questionable habits of both parties, many streets in Boston exist in a de facto state of Shared Space, the slowly & steadily growing idea of Dutch planner Hans Monderman. It seems we are edging toward the recognition that the urban street is an altogether unique creature.
The idea is that all our fussing and stoplights and walklights and orchestration for safety is making our streets less safe. Drivers and pedestrians believe if they obey, everything will be fine. People stop thinking. Shared Space advocates the removal of curbs, signs, lights, etc. and letting people figure it out for themselves. Calling on common sense and cooperation, it harnesses the civility of people rather than letting it atrophy. Apparently it actually does reduce accidents, and reportedly reduces congestion due to increased efficiency.
The aesthetic value of clearing the clutter is promising as well, in addition to the promise of freeing urban life from the four foot strip of concrete mashed against building facades.
It's had success in the Dutch town of Drachten and in Germany.
The discussion brings the larger political implications of urban design tantalizingly close to the surface, but that's a post for another day.
The idea is that all our fussing and stoplights and walklights and orchestration for safety is making our streets less safe. Drivers and pedestrians believe if they obey, everything will be fine. People stop thinking. Shared Space advocates the removal of curbs, signs, lights, etc. and letting people figure it out for themselves. Calling on common sense and cooperation, it harnesses the civility of people rather than letting it atrophy. Apparently it actually does reduce accidents, and reportedly reduces congestion due to increased efficiency.
The aesthetic value of clearing the clutter is promising as well, in addition to the promise of freeing urban life from the four foot strip of concrete mashed against building facades.
It's had success in the Dutch town of Drachten and in Germany.
The discussion brings the larger political implications of urban design tantalizingly close to the surface, but that's a post for another day.
"We're losing our capacity for socially responsible behaviour, ...The greater the number of prescriptions, the more people's sense of personal responsibility dwindles." [4]
- Hans Monderman
- Hans Monderman
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)