'Machine as the Garden' & the future of development

The Spring/Summer Harvard Design Magazine's main theme is non-formal cities, a hot topic and certainly a rich one - but the there is an an exciting counterpoint to this issue. Nathalie Beauvais, examines an exceptionally 'formal' planned city (well, campus extension): Harvard's Allston Campus. And her article is, mercifully, free. 

She asserts elegantly that the environmental "performance targets... can be read like source code... [and] will direct the forms of the built environment", facades will perform as permeable, reactive skins, and an entire ecosystem of solar panels, geothermal wells, bioswales and their compatriots will increase efficiency and protect the Charles river. The article explains much better than I can (links will remain valid until the issue is archived, I'm guessing).

Frequently the sheer scale of contemporary development seems overwhelming, homogeneous, a dehumanizing beast to attach stone veneer to or rally against at town meeting. What is so exciting about this article and the idea of the working landscape is that entire neighborhoods are being thought of as systems and structures; that scale is being used to enable harmonious diversity and increase sustainability rather than threaten these things.

architecture and the modern experience

David Claerbout is currently exhibiting at MIT’s List Visual Arts Center, which I just visited (I figured I may not be in Boston that much longer, so I should take advantage of all the free awesomeness that I can). His work, from what I could tell, deals a lot with the passage of time, light as a marker/narrator of a sequence of images or scenes, and from my brief visit a lot about modern loneliness (a condition that is thoroughly modern, I have recently come to realize and will address individually at some point).

Naturally his emphasis on light creates a great deal of emphasis on space, inserting something architectural into many pieces. One seemed to comment directly on a question modern architecture has been dancing around for a while: the role of self-determination, community determination, and variety.

“Sections of a Happy Moment, 2007”, is a series of images, like a slide show, of a blissful afternoon shared by an extended Chinese family in the courtyard of a massive, urban-renewal/Corbusian housing development. After a few slides pass, emptiness begins to undermine sincerity, both of the activity (a few children toss a ball, all watch) and of the housing project (thousands must live in the complex, only one other party is seen). It begins to seem set up, promotional, propagandistic.

While this calls into question many aspects of modern living, for me it highlighted the role of self-determination in modern architecture: in our scale-crazed development paradigm, do we really deliver usable assets to clients? Did this family choose this bleak community of their own free will, and would others? Modern Americans do not, a visit to any of these archi-dictatorial creations will reveal.

Who does the architect serve, and who should be served?